RefE-889

Entered

Figures4 min · 862 words

Working paper

T1 Energy Shares Gap Down 13.6% After $0.14 Loss Misses Estimates

T1 Energy fell 10.6% to $1.8380 after a $0.14 per-share loss missed estimates by $0.02, with revenue of $196.59 million and a negative 149.67% return on equity.

Exhibit AT1 Energy (NYSE:TE) Shares Gap Down After Earnings Miss
T1 Energy (NYSE:TE) Shares Gap Down After Earnings Miss — catmoz / pixabay

T1 Energy (NYSE:TE) opened at $1.84 on Thursday, down from a $2.13 close, after the solar manufacturer reported a quarterly loss of $0.14 per share — $0.02 wider than the consensus estimate of a $0.12 loss. The stock last traded at $1.8380 on volume of 11,815,859 shares, a decline of 10.6%.

The numbers behind the gap tell a harder story than a single missed estimate. T1 Energy posted revenue of $196.59 million for the quarter. It also reported a negative net margin of 38.49% and a negative return on equity of 149.67%. A company can miss by two cents and recover; a return on equity that deep in negative territory signals the equity base itself is absorbing sustained losses.

The market's verdict was immediate. But the price action on Thursday only extends a slide already visible in the averages: the 50-day moving average sits at $3.40 and the 200-day moving average at $5.88. The stock traded far below both before the earnings gap.

What do the balance sheet and valuation show?

T1 Energy carries a current ratio of 1.30 and a quick ratio of 0.90, according to the report. The quick ratio below 1.00 means the company's most liquid assets do not fully cover near-term liabilities — a point worth watching for a manufacturer still scaling U.S. production.

The debt-to-equity ratio stands at 3.50. That figure, paired with a negative return on equity of 149.67%, describes a capital structure under real strain.

Valuation metrics compound the picture. The company has a market capitalization of $560.78 million, a price-to-earnings ratio of -0.96 and a beta of 2.48. A negative earnings multiple confirms the losses; a beta of 2.48 tells investors the stock moves more than twice as sharply as the broader market in either direction.

Takeaway in plain words: the balance sheet is leveraged, the losses are current, and the stock swings hard.

Where do analysts stand after the miss?

The research desks have not spoken with one voice, and the spread in their targets is wide enough to question what each is valuing.

  • JPMorgan Chase & Co. started coverage on Monday, September 14, with a "neutral" rating and a $5.00 price target.
  • BTIG Research raised its price objective from $8.00 to $9.00 and kept a "buy" rating on Wednesday, August 12.
  • Needham & Company LLC cut its target from $7.00 to $6.00 and set a "buy" rating on Friday, October 23.
  • Weiss Ratings upgraded the stock from "sell (e+)" to "sell (d-)" on Friday, October 16 — an upgrade that still lands on sell.
  • Vertical Research assumed coverage on Thursday, September 17, issuing a "hold" rating and a $5.00 target.

The aggregate picture: one Strong Buy, five Buy, four Hold and one Sell rating, producing a consensus of "Moderate Buy" and a consensus price target of $7.50, according to MarketBeat.com.

A $7.50 consensus against a $1.84 open implies more than 300% upside. When a consensus target sits that far above the trading price, either the analysts see something the market does not, or the target average lags the decline. The Weiss upgrade from one sell grade to another suggests at least one shop read the same filings and reached the opposite conclusion from BTIG.

What are institutional investors doing?

Institutional investors and hedge funds own 52.31% of the company's stock, and several built positions during the first half of the year.

  • Renaissance Technologies LLC boosted its stake by 232.2% in the first quarter, buying 8,289,050 additional shares. It now holds 11,858,306 shares valued at $52,058,000.
  • Situational Awareness LP acquired a new first-quarter position of approximately $43,900,000.
  • Electron Capital Partners LLC raised its holdings by 69.4% in the first quarter, adding 2,429,564 shares to reach 5,929,585 shares valued at $26,031,000.
  • Squarepoint Ops LLC increased its holdings by 35.2% in the second quarter, adding 371,874 shares to reach 1,429,027 shares valued at $13,547,000.
  • Bank of New York Mellon Corp bought a new second-quarter position of approximately $7,768,000.

The caveat: these filings reflect first- and second-quarter activity, before the stock fell below its $3.40 fifty-day average. Whether those positions still stand at current prices, the disclosures do not say.

Who is T1 Energy?

T1 Energy, formerly known as FREYR Battery, abandoned its original battery production strategy and pivoted to building a domestic U.S. solar supply chain. The company is developing manufacturing operations in Texas, including facilities intended to produce solar cells and modules for the photovoltaic market. Its strategy centers on expanding U.S.-based solar manufacturing for customers seeking domestically produced products.

A strategy pivot plus deepening losses plus $560.78 million in market value leaves little room for execution error.

The shares gapped down on a two-cent miss; the balance sheet, not the estimate, is the larger number on the page.

Audit trail

  1. T1 Energy reported a quarterly loss of $0.14 per share, missing the $0.12 consensus by $0.02.
  2. The stock gapped down from a $2.13 close to a $1.84 open, trading at $1.8380 on 11,815,859 shares.
  3. Quarterly revenue was $196.59 million; net margin was negative 38.49%.
  4. Analyst consensus is Moderate Buy with a $7.50 target, against a $560.78 million market capitalization.
  5. Institutional investors own 52.31% of the stock.

via dailypolitical.com (Source)

Filed under

  • t1-energy
  • quarterly-earnings
  • solar-manufacturing
  • balance-sheet
  • analyst-ratings
Share this article:

More from Tom Whitfield

Tom Whitfield

Show full bio

News editor covering companies, deals and strategy in corporate finance and the leaders who run it at CFO Observer.

214 articles

Cross-references

« Previous articleNext article »